I am glad you mentioned these things EB
Posted on December 10, 2006 at 05:29:52 AM by Kenedeno

EB: "Did you or did you not post a few months back that you were dragged into Judge JAG's court over a truancy issue involving one of your kids?"

JK: Yes, I did. When a parent takes his child to school and he arrives on time (he becomes a student under the Jurisdiction of the school administration); the child is in the custody of the school. While the child is on school grounds he is subject to the rules of the school as the school is subject to the custodial responsibility. Anything that happens during the day is under the school's watch. If the student is absent during the middle of the day who's watch is it under? If the child is tardy or walking the halls; who's watch is it? However, when the student is tardy or skipping during the middle periods, the school admin, the attendance clerk and the truancy officer engage themselves. They begin the documentation of the "truant events". There is a computer that will call to inform the household that the "student was absent one or more periods today". Keep in mind the automated system is readily discounted by the administration when they cannot find the reason it called. That is when the parent contacts the school to inquire to specifically which class was the child absent or tardy, why was the machine reporting the child absent? Now all of this said kids roaming the halls, tardy and absent is being allowed by who? Who's custody did the parents release the child into? But, once the truant events add up as they are allowed; the child and the parents are charged with truancy and adult contributing to truancy respectively. That means for the child an automatic slam dunk $500 ching ching, the parent slam dunked and another $500 ching ching and then the other parent $500 ching ching. Now tell me how that is right and just EB? I have every right and every reason to write about this injustice. And you are correct I do have an angle it is called EQUAL JUSTICE for all.



EB: "You see,Jaime..I make it a point to remember these things because it helps me put your rantings on certain things in their proper context."

JK: You remember so you can take them out of context and twist for your anti Jaime angle. Hell EB I could say the temp is below 90 degrees outside right now and you would find a way to argue about it.


EB: "For instance:

Your rantings on "deadbeat MEs who cover up crimes"...stem from the fact that you think the Fernandezes owe you money..oh..and land,too."

JK: If he wants to cover up facts or other heirs would that not open the door to covering up or manipulating evidence? Now, I can provide a little more indight if you follow the link address.

"Marie Fernandez that showed up to my office one Friday and tried to bribe me with another family member by stated the cause of death could be changed."

http://corpuschristicallertimes.blogspot.com/2006/12/marie-fernandez-that-showed-up-to-my.html



EB: "Your rantings on Del Mar..stem from something you allege happened to some chick your brother USED to date..(and probably from the fact that you USED to be a student there,and now you're not,which would lead any thinking person to wonder whether you have some personal axe to grind).It's funny how you pretend to be morally outraged at "sexual harassment" at Del Mar,yet you supported a slug for Sheriff whose campaign manager and potential Chief Deputy is a serial womanizer and documented sexual abuser..and you knew it but supported him anyway."



JK: The "chick" (1 of over many victims who cam forward) is my brother's significant other. My involvement in this fight has everything to do with the community. There is a construction vested interest coupled with the self dealing shell game which is leveraged by others like Carlos Garcia who loves tits and ass. I have not one hesitation to refer to Mike Westergren , Joe Alaniz, Carlos Garcia and the like as corrupt along with police reports, written testimony and documents displaying them for the worms they truly are. With Pete Alvarez there is no certainty the womanizer would have become part of the Sheriffs Dept. You can make the arguement all day long. But if he would have moved with Pete would not these inappropriate actions be enough to deny him the position if the public spoke up? Why dont you show us some documents on the "sexual abuse" EB?

EB: "Your attempted character assassination of Juan Garcia..you claimed he couldn't be trusted,that he had no ethics or morals..yet you tried to sell your "services" to his campaign.It was only AFTER he told you and "Team Kenedeno" to take a hike,that you began attacking him.Which..again,would lead any thinking person to wonder..if he'd have hired you,would you STILL have dogged him in these forums?..I'll bet you wouldn't have..in fact..I'll even bet you you'd hve been busily posting reams of crap telling us what a wonderful guy he is".

JK: I will keep this simple. Juan shook my hand, asked me to start working (writing) and bring the public into this race. He said he had very little money at the time to pay for my services but if we could bring the public into the HD #32 RACE the money would come in from the big donors. I told him I would challenge Mikal to kick in some dinero and I would get the money coming in. Juan also claimed he wanted a debate with Seaman but he said it would take an act of god. I assured him I would get Seaman to debate him. Juan was scared to debate Seaman. He got his ass kicked at every joust. Juan never told us to take a hike, he kept on saying tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow and then was too much of a puss to answer the phone and tell me to take a hike or whatever; he is ashamed and he cannot look me in the eyes (and I have been in his presence) because he knows he lied and hid like a coward. And you brought him up so don’t go there with the I cant let it go bs.

EB: “You're like the wizard from the "Wizard of Oz",Jaime..you PROJECT an image of bluster and fire and claim to have knowledge of all these various community goings on..but when you look behind the bluster and ignore the rhetoric for amoment and you pull the curtain back..there's a little guy behind it trying furiously to spin something into something it's not.”

JK: What is wrong with the Wizard of OZ? He got the people to have confidence in themselves. He enabled the Lion to find his courage. He enabled the scarecrow to find his intelligence etc etc etc……