does this make common sense?Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:15:31 AM by dannoynted1

Take a deep breath Cato... 5/31/2006 10:38 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certainly things can get done the way they are now. I heard that the port could operate more efficiently if they had a way to accomodate larger ships. Supertankers wouldn't have to offload in the gulf onto other ships and have them deliver it. It would be faster if they brought it in themselves. This is only one issue for the bridge. Realistically, we won't have a say in the construction of the new bridge. Bigger people than us will make the decision regardless. In other words, I'm sure someone's pockets are going to benefit from it. I hate to say it Cato, I don't think Rock drilling will be the one. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and just how could you possibly know who will benefit? is your pocket being lined? i am sure you have no "common sense" much less know anything about it when you get some then maybe you can get a "piece of the rock"
====================================================================

. Two reasons cited for tearing down a historical landmark....
Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:56:42 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

and notice neither of them deal with who will be making bucoooos of dinero. Corrosion? Not a factor for at leat another 50 years or so and that is if we stopped all maintainence. Think it will still be standing after a major hurricane? I say yes. Height?? Why height? How is it better to bring the ship all the way in than to offload away from the public. Public Safety must be a primary factor. These ships are clumsy at best. Let us not forget the Super Tanker Exxon Valdez. Bottom line is Social Status & Economic status of a select few at the expense of taxpayer money and our safety. Oh yeah, when we built cargo dock 1 it was designed for industry not parties and board rooms.Replies:
Curmy in response to Rock's infrastructure enhancement arguement. Rock might as well give it up - By Jaime 4 Curmy June 1, 2006 at 11:29:51 AM
Re(1): Two reasons poor progressives are not benefiting - By dannoynted1 June 1, 2006 at 09:15:02 AM
CENSORSHIP: Good grief, did we hit a nerve? - By Jaime 4 TEXWRITES June 1, 2006 at 00:43:40 AM
Re(1): CENSORSHIP: Good grief, did we hit a nerve? - By Jaime 4 CATO June 1, 2006 at 00:44:46 AM
censor capitan? does this make common sense? - By dannoynted1 June 1, 2006 at 00:26:30 AM
It might be best... - By Major Carrales June 1, 2006 at 02:19:32 PM
Thank You El Capitan...... - By Jaime & dannoynted1 June 1, 2006 at 04:11:17 PM
Two things that threaten the Corporate Welfare beneficiaries..... - By Jaime Kenedeno June 1, 2006 at 00:38:53 AM
2005
==============================================================================================

Curmy in response to Rock's infrastructure enhancement arguement. Rock might as well give it upPosted on June 1, 2006 at 11:29:51 AM by Jaime 4 Curmy

he has done been blackballed for previous statements. curmudgeon Posts: 2900 The existing bridge is . . . 6/1/2006 9:36 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . . . adequate. If you think that bringing bigger ships into the port will enhance the lives of the average resident I have a bridge to sell you.

=====================================================================================================

Re(1): Two reasons poor progressives are not benefitingPosted on June 1, 2006 at 09:15:02 AM by dannoynted1

Message
curtis rock
Posts: 726
Re: Some support the harbor bridge to get rich, not for community 6/1/2006 7:21 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rock Engineering wouldn't be the only beneficiary, it would be a stimulus for the entire community. Perhaps you don't have that forward-thinking ability. Even if Rock Engineering doesn't benefit from the actual design or construction, it would still benefit our firm in the long run. Even I can see that.
==========================================================
CENSORSHIP: Good grief, did we hit a nerve?Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:43:40 AM by Jaime 4 TEXWRITES
texwrites Posts: 321 Censorship Here 6/1/2006 12:31 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wowee My post about getting the bridge declared an historical landmark has been purged. This topic shows 16 posts and now only 9 remain. Good grief, did we hit a nerve? I was trying humor and someone thought it had possibilities I guess. How troubling that something like that would get the ax.
=====================================================================
Re(1): CENSORSHIP: Good grief, did we hit a nerve?Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:44:46 AM by Jaime 4 CATOCato Posts: 135 Some support the harbor bridge to get rich, not for community 6/1/2006 12:46 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why are the lights of the harbor bridge turned of as textwrite wrote, to make it less attractive? The guy (engineer) that built the harbor bridge led the project to built mount Rushmore. The bridge like the courthouse is a historical site.
=====================================================================

censor capitan? does this make common sense?
Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:26:30 AM by dannoynted1

what say you capitan? all jaimes posts were once again deleted by that hater talk radio wannabe american guess he cant stand those ice cold showers he even deleted johnseys posts! why? he has no common sense!
===================================================================
It might be best...Posted on June 1, 2006 at 02:19:32 PM

by Major Carrales...if you didn't worry about that forum so much. A simple google search reveals that your best work is done outside that forum. Eric is going to remove your posts on principle until you "play by his rules." No matter what they be. Since he pays for that out of his own pocket I am suprise he allows the freedom of opinion he does. But that is regulated by his own whims. His current rule en re you is to appologize to him for what ever it is that is between you. That is between you and him. That is something only you and he can resolve...if you even want to do that. I don't know why he deleted the post on the bridge...other threadsters have raised the issue. As for my advise to you... strongly suggest you create a podcast or internet radio show. That is , in my opinion, you next move. Call into his show and ask him the questions. BTW, I enjoyed seeing you, dannoynted1 and meeting your brother. Thank for inviting me to that meeting, but I ould not go and needed to get back home by a certain hour. And,as you know, home is 70 miles from that point. Keep the faith and have a good one!!!
====================================================================
Thank You El Capitan......Posted on June 1, 2006 at 04:11:17 PM by Jaime & dannoynted1

We will take it under advisement.
Gracias
========================================================================
Two things that threaten the Corporate Welfare beneficiaries.....Posted on June 1, 2006 at 00:38:53 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

1) A movement against building a new bridge and tearing down a historical landmark residing in a historical designated area. Public Opinion can over rule imminent domain. 2)A challenge to the incumbent Gene Seaman to debate his well respected opponent Desert Storm Aviator Juan Garcia. The Agenda is clear. Where do you stand El Capitan? It just goes to demonstrate the cowardice of some and the selective nature of others when it comes to our constitution. A Sea Man or a Desert Storm Aviator We dont need your message board or KEYS Radio.

2)WATT happened to the Skatepark????